Sunset Equestrian Center Preservation

Argued that the facility's closure was a choice by the owner, not a lack of demand.

Asked the commission to respect the original development agreement.

Stated that the commission has a duty to uphold development agreements.

Argued that the property is tied to a development agreement requiring it to be an equestrian center.

Shared how the loss of boarding facilities impacts her equestrian business.

Stated that the property was purchased with the understanding it would remain an equestrian center.

Spoke about the life lessons learned through the horse-human relationship.

Urged the commission to preserve the character of the city by keeping the facility.

Urged the commission to vote no to protect the facility.

Cited CC&Rs and the recorded plat as evidence that the land must remain open space.

Defended her mother's decision, citing the extreme financial and physical toll of running the business.

Raised concerns about traffic, water, and school capacity if the rezone is approved.

Expressed shock at the staff recommendation and concern about the loss of community character.